Cambodia is at the brink of disaster as Justice System is sacked and twisted

Posted by: | Posted on: April 24, 2016

តាមតថភាពជាក់ស្តែង ប្រព័ន្ធយុត្តិធម៍នៅកម្ពុជាបានធ្វើដំណើរមកដល់ចំណុចគ្រោះថ្នាក់បំផុតមួយ សព្វថ្ងៃនេះ។ ដំណាក់កណ្តាលផ្លូវកាច់នេះបានគាស់កកាយការពិតនៃនយោបាយខ្មៅកខ្វក់និងអាកប្បកិរិយានយោបាយដែលប្រឡាក់ដិតដាមយូរយារមកហើយរបស់កម្ពុជា។ ដោយមិនផ្តោតសំខាន់ទៅលើកិច្ចខិតខំប្រឹងប្រែងដើម្បីនាំមកនូវជំនឿទុកចិត្តក្នុងសង្គម ម្ចាស់ពានរង្វាន់ខាងយុទ្ធសាស្រ្តនយោបាយបានប្រើវិធីសាស្រ្តផ្សេងៗដើម្បីកកូរកកាយសង្គមដែលពោរពេញទៅដោយមនុស្សមានជំងឺបាក់ស្បាតអោយបាក់ស្បាតកាន់តែខ្លាំងឡើងដោយការអង្រួនអោយចំតំលៃពិតរបស់វា។

រដ្ឋដែលគួរអោយគោរពមួយរមែងមានធាតុផ្សំសំខាន់របស់វាពីរគឺការអភិវឌ្ឍន៌សេដ្ឋកិច្ចប្រកបដោយចិរភាពនិងច្បាស់លាស់ ហើយនឹងការវេញធ្លុងយ៉ាងមាំរបស់ជាតិតាមរយះធនធានសង្គមនៃការជឿជាក់ទុកចិត្តគ្នា។ នៅពេលណាដែលធាតុផ្សំណាមួយត្រូវបានគេបំផ្លាញឬអង្រួនអោយដួល ការរស់រានមានជីវិតនៃជាតិនោះគឺកំពុងស្ថិតនៅក្នុងជ្រោះមរណៈ។ ថ្ងៃនេះ យុត្តិធម៌សង្គមត្រូវបានគេវាយលុកបាន ថ្ងៃស្អែកចលាចលសង្គមអាចនឹងផ្ទុះឡើង ថ្ងៃខានស្អែកភ្លើងឆេះកល្បទាំងស្រុងនឹងមកដល់ ។ល។

Cambodia Leadership Skills Special Cambodia Leadership Skills Flagrante DelictoActually, the justice system in Cambodia has reached its critical stage right now. This crossroad juncture unearthed the dirty politics and ingrained political behavior of Cambodia. Without conducting proper agenda to bringing about trust from the people, the tactician has used different tactics to stir this traumatized society into more traumatized by shaking the core value of it.

A dignified nation-state comprises of at least two components: the savvy and sustainable economic development and the tight national bond through trust and cohesive social capital. Whenever, one of these two are damaged or shaken, the survival of that nation is at the brink. Today, social justice is sacked, tomorrow social upheaval exploded, after tomorrow total annihilation arrived etc.


Right to vote of Cambodians overseas responding to Hun Manet

Posted by: | Posted on: April 20, 2016

Political Paradigm of Pragmatism from the Khmer Youth part 60

ក្នុងនាមជាអ្នករស់នៅក្រៅប្រទេសម្នាក់ មានការសោកស្តាយចំពោះមតិរបស់លោកហ៑ុន ម៉ាណែតទាក់ទងនឹងសិទ្ធិបោះឆ្នោតរបស់ខ្មែរដែលកំពុងរស់នៅក្រៅប្រទេស។

ឳពុករបស់លោកនិងរូបលោកផ្ទាល់ហាក់បីដូចជាគ្មានឆន្ទៈនយោបាយក្នុងការសំរួលអោយខ្មែរដែលកំពុងរស់នៅបរទេសជិត២លាននាក់បានចូលរួមបោះឆ្នោតបាន។ ឳពុកលោកនិងរូបលោកមានហេតុផលប្រហាក់ប្រហែលគ្នា ដែលហេតុផលទាំងនោះជាបញ្ហាបច្ចេកទេសសុទ្ធសាធ។ បើនិយាយពីបញ្ហាបច្ចេកទេសវិញ យើងអាចសំរួលតាមរបៀបមីយ៉ាន់ម៉ា ថៃ ឬហ្វីលីពីន ឬយើងអាចពិភាក្សាបង្កើតរបៀបរបស់យើងទាំងស្រុង។

ការមិនសំរួលអោយខ្មែររស់ក្រៅប្រទេសអាចបោះឆ្នោតបានដោយងាយស្រួល គឺជាការរំលោភរដ្ឋធម្មនុញ្ញខ្មែរ ក៏ដូចជាកតិកាសញ្ញាអន្តរជាតិដែលកម្ពុជាជាភាគីហត្ថលេខី។

Courtesy: Hun Manet Facebook Page

Courtesy: Hun Manet Facebook Page

On behalf of a Cambodian oversea, I am disappointed by Hun Manet who was interviewed by VOA Khmer recently about the rights to vote of Cambodians overseas.

His father and Hun Manet seems have no political will to facilitate easy access for Cambodians overseas to exercise their rights to vote. He and his father have the same reason to not allow Cambodians overseas to vote as those reasons are typical technical issues. If we are going to discuss technical issues, we could learn from Myanmar, Thailand and the Philippines, or we can establish our own mechanism.

Intention to obstruct Cambodians overseas to vote in Cambodia elections is a violation over Cambodia Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of the United Nations in which Cambodia is a covenant.


The 1993 Cambodian Constitution: glass half-empty or glass half-full?

Posted by: | Posted on: April 20, 2016
Thu, 24 September 2009

Op-Ed: Phnom Penh Post

On the 16th anniversary of its adoption, observers reopen a debate on the founding document’s legacy

janauary-7-2009KEY PROVISIONS IN THE 1993 CAMBODIAN CONSTITUTION:

  • Article 7: The King shall reign, but shall not govern.
  • Article 31: The Kingdom of Cambodia shall recognise and respect human rights as stipulated in the United Nations charter, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the covenants and conventions related to human rights, women’s and children’s rights.
  • Article 41: Khmer citizens shall have freedom of expression, press, publication and assembly. No one shall exercise this right to infringe upon the rights of others, to affect the good traditions of the society, to violate public law and order and national security.
  • Article 44: The right to confiscate possessions from any person shall be exercised only in the public interest.
  • Article 51: The legislative, executive and judicial powers shall be separated.
  • Article 80: No [National] Assembly member shall be prosecuted, detained or arrested because of opinions expressed during the exercise of his or her duties.
  • Article 132: Revision or amendments shall be enacted by a constitutional law passed by the Assembly with a two-thirds majority vote.

AS the Kingdom marks the 16th birthday of its Constitution, adopted with much fanfare on this day in 1993, observers remain divided on the elusive document, opening a debate on whether it stands as a symbol of Cambodia’s emergence from years of war and conflict or a sign of squandered opportunities.

Cambodia’s founding fathers – a motley mix of lapsed Marxists, royalists, nationalist resistance fighters and foreign consultants – spent more than a year drafting a new Constitution together from the Kingdom’s 1947 Constitution and human rights stipulations contained in the October 1991 Paris Peace Agreements.

The Constitution that came into force on September 24, 1993, was a watershed in Cambodian history, containing a separation of powers (Article 51), adherence to international human rights treaties (Article 31) and a series of provisions respecting basic civil rights (Articles 32 to 50).

Coming at the tail end of the United Nations Transitional Authority in Cambodia (UNTAC) and just four months after Cambodia’s first multi-party elections in decades, the Constitution arrived at an important crossroads in the country’s history. But some say the story of the document since 1993 has largely been one of form over substance.

“We have a sophisticated set of documents, but documents are only papers. The facade is there, but there is no democratic substance,” opposition leader Sam Rainsy told the Post.

Read More …


Elections in Cambodia are thought as a mean to prolong authoritarian power

Posted by: | Posted on: April 18, 2016

Political Paradigm of Pragmatism from the Khmer Youth 59

This part (59), Mr. Sophan Seng analysed on the recent public statement and press conference by Comfrel or The committee for free and fair elections in Cambodia. According to the press conference, Mr. Michael who is one of the advisory board members stressed that the ongoing practices of authoritarian countries which have used election as a pretext to renew their power, and Mr. Pannha who is director placed doubts on state’s inference with current national election committee (NEC).

kuoy bunroeunMr. Sophan highly agreed with Michael that through academic researches and real world politiks, many authoritarian countries are conducting elections to legitimize their power. Often, those countries including Cambodia under PM Hun Sen leadership, they have always attempted to threat and intimidate the voters through using public speech on both explicit and implicit threatening. More than that, they have always used judiciary system to favor their political agenda.

For what Mr. Pannha said, Mr. Sophan observed that NEC that was created by 4 members from each political parties are not in equilibrium of power because 4 members from government-led party CPP could enjoy the free ride of both conducting daily business without intimidation and fear of political reprisal at all. For 4 members from opposition party, CNRP, they are mindful in all movements and they are easily been feared, distracted, and faced political reprisal in all time. The bad working environment for 4 members from opposition party is also significantly caused by the ongoing biased court of Cambodia.

At the end, the lacking of political will of Hun Sen leadership to include Cambodians overseas to vote, is another attempt showing that election is just a mean for his long term grip in power in Cambodia.


Happy Khmer New Year 2560

Posted by: | Posted on: April 18, 2016

ក្នុងឱកាសថ្ងៃចុងក្រោយនៃពិធីបុណ្យចូលឆ្នាំថ្មី ឆ្នាំវក អដ្ឋស័ក ពុទ្ធសករាជ ២៥៦០ នេះ

សូមប្រសិទ្ធិពរជ័យសិរីបវរមហាប្រសើរចូរមានដល់អ្នក ក្រុមគ្រួសារ និងសហសេវិនកុំបីឃ្លៀងឃ្លាតឡើយ។

A modern Khmer artAt the end of Khmer Khmer New Year 2560

Wish you, family members, and colleagues a prosperous and joyous new year.

 


The statement of CNRP from the Congress is amicable and admirable on Cambodians Overseas

Posted by: | Posted on: April 8, 2016

Political Paradigm of Pragmatism from the Khmer Youth part 58

12919819_1320040814679881_5214081553809602172_n12439197_1320042804679682_6310063124382049123_n12439099_1320042941346335_2659081947169019283_n

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This part (58), Mr. Sophan Seng analysed on the recent outcome publicly announced by Cambodia National Rescue Party (CNRP) supportive to all Cambodians overseas in participating with politics and social development of Cambodia.

The statement didn’t explicitly concluded Cambodians overseas the full rights to vote within all Cambodia elections, but the intent to advocate for full participation from all Cambodians overseas is amicable and admirable.

Furthering to his appreciation of the statement, Mr. Sophan urged CNRP’s 55 members of parliament to write proposal to the assembly to amend law or adjust election chapter to state clearly that Cambodians overseas can exercise full rights to vote in Cambodia elections.

He also directed the issue to Prime Minister Hun Sen to initiate this plan at the earliest during his mandate so that he could be remembered in a long term for his leadership in developing democracy in Cambodia.