Cambodia Court

now browsing by tag

Posted by: | Posted on: December 9, 2020

Sophoan Seng addressed repatriation plan of 04 January 2021 is purely facing with court summons

Talking on live show of Youth Voice for Justice of CNRP America, Mr. Sophoan adamantly articulated the viable plan returning back to Cambodia of CNRP leadership led by Mu Sochua as it is a mature political attitude responding to the court’s summons.

Facebook Live Talk Show Link

  1. Legally speaking, the repatriation plan is purely to fight with the accusation of the Phnom Penh municipal Court summoned by deputy prosecutor Seng Heang. The accusation is bogus “plotting” to commit treason and “incitement” to commit a felony which are a serious crime without bleeding or hurting anybody physically and mentally at all. The accusation is politically motivated. The due process is non-existent as en mass trial was created by improper en mass name listing all together to attest to a public building. The court proceeding is set up to denounce all justice attempts because the defendants are not allowed to having sufficient time to prepare themselves at all including seeking or exercising rights to obtaining legal counsel or attorney. While the initial accusation is high the chance of trial in absentia is pretty bogus, this returning back to fight the legal accusation is apolitical. And no one can block or ban this physical presenting of the defendants as well as manipulating the court proceeding.
  2. Political pragmatism has been visibly emerging among Cambodian people and their leaders. Court proceedings are considered the most safety net of social reform and social order revitalization although it is a bad court or a good court. When a society is at war, the brave men and women are needed to carry gun; but when a society is at peace, the brave men and women are needed to carry pen and paper. The court of Cambodia has been notoriously known for its “travesty of justice”. Many men and women have already been thrown in jail because of this bad court practice, and the sacrifices of those men and women shall deepen a new successful chapter of history of Cambodia. The grand policy to walk into the court room in order to restructure, repaint, restore human resource and refinance it, is very pragmatic and optimistic.
Posted by: | Posted on: August 6, 2015

Notorious Court in Cambodia

The heated up political tension orchestrated by Hun Sen is to simply use the court as his experiment tool of throwing  fire into a cold water. CNRP has boldly claimed its nonviolence and culture of dialogue during this tension. 

How much have we known the notorious court in Cambodia?

State authorized this private security guards to beat the protesters.

State authorized this private security guard to beat the peaceful protesters.

Khmer people believe that in the past our court system was using “oath or swear” conducting to ensure individual sincerity and integrity. The state administration was “Deva-Raja” or “Cult of Personality” that King was named Universal Ruler. There are no scientific evidence to ensure the preciseness resulting from those swearing testimonial performance, and how much the state performed free and independent procedures.

In the West, Thomas Hobbs aggressively criticized the “State of Nature” in

A man blinded the court not to see those violent chasers on a motorist. Photo courtesy: Facebook

A man blinded the court not to see those violent chasers on a motorist. Photo courtesy: Facebook

which holy man is the ruler. Hobbs called such ruler “Leviathan” who critically proclaimed their specific legitimacy from the sky angel.

During the Khmer Rouge regime, the court was also set up to legitimize their brutal leadership. Now, it has inherited to the present Cambodia government under Hun Sen leadership, the same court has been used to threat and jail the dissents.

The 11 political protesters were jailed by the court.

The 11 protesters were jailed by the court in the charge of national insurrection happened immediately after Hun Sen warned in his televised speech.

How Cambodia country as an institution can bring down the leader(s), tycoons, or politician(s) who have pervasively and evidently abused the power to deviate the neutral and independent court of Cambodia?

This puzzling question has remained unanswered.

In Canada, looking from my daily lenses, the smallest problem happened, it has been brought up to the court, at the same procedure with the biggest problem. For instance, if I was driving in high speed, the road-camera or

The two latest protesters are jailed including one in custody.

The two latest protesters are jailed including one in custody in the charge of assisting national insurrection happened after Hun Sen warned during his televised speech.

onsite policeman will send or hand me the ticket with proof of photo, and the ticket gives us two options: to pay voluntarily or to appeal to the court. The biggest problem, Prime Minister or Minister or high profile entity, shall face with the court at the same procedure like everyone if those committed legal fault.

One of the citizenship obligations is to sit as jury in the court. This is an encouragement for all to learn about the legal procedures and understand this common duty.

Cambodian people have been bitterly suffered by the court system. With no doubt, leader has blinded them for their own advantage.

Read More …

Posted by: | Posted on: July 22, 2015

Cambodia jails 11 opposition party members for insurrection

Cambodia jails 11 opposition party members for insurrection

A Cambodian court has sentenced 11 opposition party members to jail terms ranging from seven to 20 years for insurrection after an anti-government protest turned violent a year ago.

11 incarcerate 11 Prisoners of ConsciencePHNOM PENH: A court in Cambodia jailed 11 opposition party members on Tuesday for insurrection after an anti-government protest turned violent a year ago, a verdict that could rock a fragile truce between the country’s rival political forces.

The 11 Cambodia National Rescue Party (CNRP) members received jail terms ranging from seven to 20 years for forcibly trying to reopen the country’s only designated protest venue, “Freedom Park”, defence lawyer Sorn Sudalen told Reuters.

The park was temporarily shut as outrage against the ruling Cambodia People’s Party (CPP) grew among activists and trade unions in the wake of a disputed 2013 election, rattling the administration of long-serving Prime Minister Hun Sen.

Chaos erupted during the rally, as security forces fired tear gas and charged CNRP supporters with batons.

Naly Pilorge, director of Cambodian rights group Licadho, described Tuesday’s court proceedings as a “show trial”.

“We are shocked,” she said. “This is another clear example of how the executive is using courts to threaten political activists.”

The CNRP activists were bailed as part of a peace agreement struck last year between the CPP and CNRP that led to the opposition ending its parliamentary boycott, but there have been signs of tension resurfacing.

Political experts have been sceptical about how lasting the “new culture of dialogue” would be, given the long and bitter history between heavyweights in the two parties.

CNRP, a reincarnation of a formerly impotent opposition, stunned the CPP in the 2013 election by winning votes from urban middle classes, disgruntled textiles workers and farmers angered by land grabs.

The 2018 election will be closely watched as former Khmer Rouge soldier Hun Sen seeks to extend a three-decade grip on power that critics say has been reinforced by the influence he wields over Cambodia’s judiciary, bureaucracy and military.

Posted by: | Posted on: February 24, 2015

Cambodia court is very dependent

ជាង​នេះ​ទៅ​ទៀត សូម្បី​តែ​លោក​នាយក​រដ្ឋ​មន្ត្រី​ក៏​ហាក់​បី​ដូចជា​ទទួល​ស្គាល់​តុលាការ​មាន​ភាព​ពុក​រលួយ​ដែរ ដូច​ករណី​ដោះលែង​ឪពុក-ម្តាយ ថោង សារ៉ាត់ ឲ្យ​នៅ​ក្រៅ​ឃុំ​ជាដើម។ រឿងរ៉ាវ​តុលាការ​នៅ​ស្រុក​ខ្មែរ​ប្រៀប​ដូចជា​រឿង​ភេ និង​ឆ្កែ​ចចក នៅ​ក្នុង​សៀវភៅ​រៀន​អាន​ថ្នាក់ ទី១ នៅ​ពេល​ដែល​សត្វ​ភេ ២ ក្បាល​បាន​ចាប់​បាន​ត្រី​តែ ១ ហើយ​ចែក​គ្នា​មិន​ដាច់​យក​ទៅ​ប្តឹង​សត្វ​ឆ្កែ​ចចក ពេល​នោះ​ឆ្កែ​ចចក​កាត់​សេចក្តី​មិន​ស្មើ ហើយ​ឆ្កែ​ចចក​ឆ្លៀត​កាត់​សាច់​ត្រី​យក​ខ្លួន​ឯង​មួយ​ផ្នែក​ធំ តែ​សត្វ​ភេ​ទាំង ២ ក្បាល​នៅ​តែ​មិន​សុខ​ចិត្ត​នឹង​គ្នា ទី​បំផុត​បាន​តែ​ម្នាក់​មួយ​ចំណិត​តូច​នៃ​សត្វ​ត្រី​ដែល​ខ្លួន​រក​បាន​នោះ។ ហើយ​ពេល​ខ្លះ​មន្ត្រី​នៅ​តុលាការ​ក៏​មាន​ការ​ប្រជែង​គ្នា​រឿង​ទំនាស់​ផល​ប្រយោជន៍​ជាមួយ​នឹង លោក មាលតី នេះ​ដែរ គឺថា​នៅ​ពេល​ណា​មាន​ករណី​កាត់​ក្តី​រឿង​អំពើ​ហិង្សា​ក្នុង​គ្រួសារ ឬ​ក៏​ការ​ប្រទូស្ត​កេរ្តិ៍​ខ្មាស ឬ​ក៏​ការ​លែង​លះ​ប្តី​ប្រពន្ធ​គឺ​ឲ្យ​ទៅ​គេ រីឯ​ករណី​កាត់​ក្តី​ធំៗ​ដែល​ពាក់ព័ន្ធ​លុយ​កាក់​ច្រើន ដូច​ជា​ទំនាស់​ដីធ្លី ឬ​បទ​ឧក្រិដ្ឋ​ធំៗ ដូច​ករណី​ដី​យាយ​ក្រពើ និង​ជន​សង្ស័យ ថោង សារ៉ាត់ ជាដើម​នោះ​គឺ​អញ​ជា​អ្នក​កាត់​ក្តី។ នេះ​ក៏​ជា​សិល្បៈ​មួយ​ដែរ។


អតីត​ប្រធាន​សាលា​ដំបូង​រាជធានី​ភ្នំពេញ​ថ្លែង​ពេល​ដូរ​តំណែង​កន្លង​មក។ ហុង មិនា

Tong Soprach

Courtesy: Facebook


នៅ​ស្រុក​ខ្មែរ ក្រៅ​តែ​ពី​ការ​សម្តែង​ការ​ប្រគំ​តន្ត្រី កំប្លែង អាយ៉ៃ ល្ខោន និង​សៀក​រហស្សកម្ម ក៏​មាន​សម្បូរ​សិល្បៈ​នៃ​ការ​សម្តែង​ផ្សេង​ទៀត​ដូច​ជា ការ​រៀបចំ​ឈុត​ឆាក​នយោបាយ ការ​កាត់​សេចក្តី​នៅ​ក្នុង​តុលាការ ការ​ដោះ​លែង​ជន​ជាប់​ចោទ ការ​កៀប​ស៊ី​ទាំង​ភាគី​ចុង​ចោទ និង​ដើម​ចោទ ការ​ពុក​រលួយ ការ​ធ្វើ​ជា​ស្វែង​រក​ចាប់​ជន​ជាប់​ចោទ​មិន​ឃើញ ឬ​ក៏​ចាប់​បាន ដោះ​សារ​ថា​ដោយ​សារ​គ្រោះ​ធម្មជាតិ ឬ​គ្រោះថ្នាក់​ចរាចរណ៍ ជា​ពិសេស​ការ​ទម្លាក់​កំហុស​ទៅ​លើ​នរណា​ម្នាក់ ប្រសិន​បើ​គេ​ចង់​ធ្វើ​ក. ដោយ​យក​ច្បាប់​មក​ប្រើ​គឺ​មិន​ចេះ​ខ្វះ​ទេ​បទ​ចោទ​នោះ ដូច​សម័យ​ខ្មែរ​ក្រហម​ចង់​អ្នក​ណា​សម្លាប់​មនុស្ស​ក៏ ប៉ុល ពត ដែរ។ ហេតុ​អ្វី​បាន​ជា​របប​នេះ គេ​ចូល​ចិត្ត​លេង​ការ​សម្តែង​បែប​អ៊ីចឹង? បើ​ម្តង​កើត​ឡើង​ចំពោះ​គេ ម្តង​ខ្លួន​ឯង​ហ្នឹង​នេះ? ឬ​មួយ​ក៏​តួអង្គ​រឿង សាម កុក ចូល​ខ្លួន​គ្រប់ៗ​គ្នា​នោះ?

ជាក់​ស្តែង​កាលពី​សប្តាហ៍មុន​នេះ មាន​ការ​សម្តែង​ចេញ​ឲ្យ​ឃើញ​លើ​គោកៗ​មួយ​ចំនួន​គ្រាន់​តែ​ករណី​ដោះ​លែង​ឪពុក​ម្តាយ ថោង សារ៉ាត់ ឲ្យ​នៅ​ក្រៅ​ឃុំ ក្រោយ​មក​ចាប់​យក​មក​ដាក់​គុក​ព្រៃស​វិញ បន្ទាប់​មក​លោក​នាយក​រដ្ឋ​មន្ត្រី ហ៊ុន សែន ស្នើ​ឲ្យ​រដ្ឋ​មន្ត្រី​យុត្តិធម៌ និង​ឧត្តម​ក្រុម​ប្រឹក្សា​នៃ​អង្គ​ចៅ​ក្រម​ធ្វើ​ការ​ស៊ើប​អង្កេត​អតីត​ប្រធាន​សាលា​ដំបូង​រាជធានី​ភ្នំពេញ លើ​ករណី​ដោះ​លែង​ឪពុក​ម្តាយ ថោង សារ៉ាត់។
Read More …